Yorkie's Place

A place to relax, kick back and talk about all things positive and negative in life.
 
HomeHome  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

Share | 
 

 Was baby Emma adopted or kidnapped?

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
BigBrownEyes29
Admin
Admin
avatar

Posts : 4527
Join date : 2009-10-23
Location : Ontario, Canada

PostSubject: Was baby Emma adopted or kidnapped?   Wed 03 Oct 2012, 12:46 am

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/53200751-78/wyatt-utah-adoption-court.html.csp

Virginia man asks U.S. high court to hear adoption case

By Brooke Adams The Salt Lake Tribune
Published December 31, 2011 6:18 pm

A Virginia father has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review his battle for custody of his daughter, arguing his case presents a "head-on collision" caused by conflicting rulings in different states and showcases how Utah's adoption law is "effectively projecting its authority well beyond its borders."

The Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA), a federal law that sets a "first in time" rule for interstate custody disputes, is designed to prevent both problems but was "undermined" by the Utah Supreme Court's July 2011 ruling against John Wyatt, he argues in a petition to the justices.

When an unmarried father such as Wyatt is in one state and prospective adoptive parents in another, there is great potential for "jurisdictional friction" if more than one state is allowed to address custody issues, the petition states. The petition asks the court to review whether the PKPA applied to the adoption case since Wyatt had filed a timely custody action under Virginia law and whether Utah violated Wyatt's rights by shutting him out of the adoption proceeding involving his daughter.

"Given the overriding importance of the interests at stake, it is especially important that the ground rules for multi-jurisdictional adoption disputes be as clear, fair and consistent as the courts — including this court — can make them," the petition states.

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a handful of decisions regarding unmarried fathers' rights in adoption proceedings, but none of those rulings involved newborn infants. It will likely be six months or so before the court decides whether to grant a review.

Since 2008, higher courts in Utah have reviewed seven cases involving unwed fathers who lost custody fights despite filing timely paternity actions in their home states to protect their rights. The Utah Supreme Court is weighing a decision in a case involving a Colorado father that involves questions about the PKPA.

"Obviously, it is an important and recurring issue," said Clifton S. Elgarten, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney who is representing Wyatt. "The Supreme Court doesn't take many cases, but we're hopeful they will see the wisdom of considering this one."

Utah attorney Larry S. Jenkins, who represents the adoption agency, said Friday he is still considering whether to file a response.

Wyatt learned in May 2008 that Emily Colleen Fahland, his then-19-year-old girlfriend, was pregnant. According to court documents, on Feb. 4, 2009, Fahland informed Wyatt by telephone that she had spoken with A Act of Love Adoption Agency, based in Utah. She sent a text message the next day that said: "Do you understand that I'm receiving information from a Utah agency for proceeding with an adoption."

But Wyatt said he thought Fahland was just gathering information and that their co-parenting plan was still in place.

Unbeknownst to Wyatt, Fahland gave birth on Feb. 10, 2009, and a day later signed a document agreeing to waive Virginia law and proceed with an adoption in Utah. Wyatt learned of the birth on Feb. 11 but was initially unable to locate Fahland, who had checked out of the hospital and into a hotel under an assumed name.

A Utah couple flew to Virginia on Feb. 12 to pick up the infant. That same day, Fahland relinquished her parental rights. Wyatt hand-delivered a letter to the adoption agency's Virginia attorney on Feb. 12 requesting to see his daughter and take her home. Wyatt said he was told he could see the infant only if he consented to the adoption. He refused.

Eight days after Baby Emma's birth, Wyatt filed a custody action in Virginia. By then, the adoptive parents had returned to Utah with the baby and, on Feb. 23, began adoption proceedings here.

From that point on, court proceedings unfolded in both Utah and Virginia. In Virginia, a judge confirmed Wyatt's rights to his child. In Utah, a judge ruled Wyatt acted too late to protect his rights since he filed a custody action in Virginia after Fahland consented to the adoption and did not file with putative-father registries in Virginia or Utah until April. The judge also said she saw "no legal basis for deferring" to the Virginia court's decision that it had jurisdiction in the case.

In July, the Utah Supreme Court upheld that decision. It also found that Wyatt could not invoke the federal kidnapping law because he had not used it to support his case in the lower court. One justice argued that the PKPA doesn't apply to adoption disputes.

In the writ of certiorari, filed Dec. 15, Wyatt notes that the Utah Supreme Court did not say when or how he might have raised the PKPA argument earlier since he was barred from participating in the adoption proceeding. He also argues that Utah requires a father to comply with the law in his home state before a mother consents to an adoption — whether or not that is the same deadline set by his home state.

"Utah law required that he fulfill Virginia's requirements more quickly than Virginia itself requires — in this case, before the baby was born and before he knew there would be any contest over his custodial rights, let alone a contest in Utah," the petition states. The Utah law also "fosters fraud and deception on an unmarried father by the mother or unscrupulous adoption agencies" but then burdens the victim with anticipating such acts, which raises "troubling due-process questions."

In fact, Wyatt said he did timely assert his rights under Virginia law, as acknowledged by a judge in that state. The petition also argues that Virginia requires a birth mother to identify and provide notice of a pending adoption to a "reasonably ascertained" father and to wait three days before consenting to an adoption, which are rules Wyatt says Fahland violated.

The Virginia court, under the PKPA, had jurisdiction to decide who received custody of Baby Emma, Wyatt argues. Instead, the Utah Supreme Court has "re-injected ambiguity and the potential for sharp conflict between states that the PKPA had seemingly eliminated with its jurisdictional command," Wyatt argues, and "widens a split among state courts" in interpretations of the federal law.

Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Was baby Emma adopted or kidnapped?   Wed 03 Oct 2012, 6:58 am

The mother wants whats best for her child. She obviously doesn't think the biological father is. I would want to see an open adoption where the father can receive updates and photos and scheduled visits but not custody.
Back to top Go down
yorkiemom
Moderator
Moderator


Posts : 11982
Join date : 2009-10-21

PostSubject: Re: Was baby Emma adopted or kidnapped?   Wed 03 Oct 2012, 8:28 am

Or the mother was just vindictive and made up her mind that the dad wasn't going to have the child

_________________
Back to top Go down
Kewl Chick
Moderator
Moderator
avatar

Posts : 4833
Join date : 2010-01-26
Age : 42
Location : ON █ ♥ █

PostSubject: Re: Was baby Emma adopted or kidnapped?   Wed 03 Oct 2012, 10:38 am

I'm with Yorkie here. Trust me I've seen enough vindictive women who do mean and bad things to men just because they feel that they can. I don't think it is up to the mother who is most likely biased to begin with to deem a father capable. All Father's have rights just as all Mother's have rights. The baby didn't get her by just one of them.

To answer BBE's question it seems like some fancy loopholes used by adoption agencies to justify kidnapping.

_________________


Don't compromise yourself. It's all you got
 Janis Joplin
Back to top Go down
BigBrownEyes29
Admin
Admin
avatar

Posts : 4527
Join date : 2009-10-23
Location : Ontario, Canada

PostSubject: Re: Was baby Emma adopted or kidnapped?   Wed 03 Oct 2012, 7:17 pm

I'm with Yorkie on this one. I think the mother was being vindictive. Whether or not the bio-father would make a good parent or not, is not up to the bio-mother to decide but the courts. Once she gave up her rights, it did not relinquish him of his rights. The adoption agency after this incident should be shut down.

Back around the early 90's in Michigan, there was situation where a pregnant mother gave up her baby for adoption to a Michigan couple. A couple years later after she had the baby, she ended up getting back with the baby's father. All this time, the bio-father did not know he had a daughter until he got back with his ex-girlfriend. Now that they were back together, bio-mother wanted her baby back but had given up her rights. Bio-father though did not konw that he had a daughter and did not give up his rights. This little girl at the time they sued to get her back was 2 years old. The end result was that, the bio-father was granted full-custody. The adoptive parents who tried so hard to have a baby of their own and couldn't, had to give back the child they loved so much and raised as their own. I remember seeing this on the news and it was heartbreaking. I felt bad for the bio-father, the adoptive parents, and the little girl. All this turmoil because the bio-mom was selfish and vindictive.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Was baby Emma adopted or kidnapped?   

Back to top Go down
 
Was baby Emma adopted or kidnapped?
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Looking for milk for adopted baby
» Newborn baby kidnapped in 1987 is reunited with her parents
» Milk for adopted baby boy in NoVA
» Adopted Baby Girl Needs BM - Born to Heroine-Addicted Birthmom
» My baby girl needs millk...

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Yorkie's Place :: Chit Chat-
Jump to: